<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1547 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466866</link>
    <description>The note addresses sustaining or reversing an addition disallowing related party purchases where the assessee produced contemporaneous documentary evidence - invoices, ledger entries, supplier confirmations and delivery proofs - and explained direct deliveries under its commercial model. It states that substantive documentary evidence and a consistent commercial explanation establish genuineness of related party purchases, and that non disclosure in Form 3CD or absence of e way bills (where GST exemption applies and delivery pattern is explained) do not, by themselves, justify disallowance; the addition was therefore deleted and the assessee&#039;s position accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 19:00:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1547 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466866</link>
      <description>The note addresses sustaining or reversing an addition disallowing related party purchases where the assessee produced contemporaneous documentary evidence - invoices, ledger entries, supplier confirmations and delivery proofs - and explained direct deliveries under its commercial model. It states that substantive documentary evidence and a consistent commercial explanation establish genuineness of related party purchases, and that non disclosure in Form 3CD or absence of e way bills (where GST exemption applies and delivery pattern is explained) do not, by themselves, justify disallowance; the addition was therefore deleted and the assessee&#039;s position accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>