<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1639 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466854</link>
    <description>Inordinate delay and laches barred challenge to the final publication of the record of rights, because stale claims against a long-finalised revenue record cannot be revived in writ jurisdiction after unexplained inaction. The writ petition was also barred where an earlier civil suit for the same relief had been withdrawn without liberty to file afresh, and suppression of that litigation attracted constructive res judicata and disentitled discretionary relief. Internal governmental notings, without any communicated and formal order, did not create an enforceable right to land allotment. The appellate order was therefore unsustainable and the High Court&#039;s interference was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 19:00:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1639 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466854</link>
      <description>Inordinate delay and laches barred challenge to the final publication of the record of rights, because stale claims against a long-finalised revenue record cannot be revived in writ jurisdiction after unexplained inaction. The writ petition was also barred where an earlier civil suit for the same relief had been withdrawn without liberty to file afresh, and suppression of that litigation attracted constructive res judicata and disentitled discretionary relief. Internal governmental notings, without any communicated and formal order, did not create an enforceable right to land allotment. The appellate order was therefore unsustainable and the High Court&#039;s interference was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>