<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1517 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466859</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value of imported knitted fabrics cannot be discarded where no reliable evidence rebuts the price paid or payable and no proof of undisclosed payments exists; expert test results and unsupported assertions about product characteristics do not justify re-determination under the Valuation Rules. Separately, adjudication conducted without issuing a show cause notice or affording a personal hearing violates principles of natural justice; statements from other importers do not substitute for appellant-specific hearing or evidence. Operative effect: the impugned order rejecting declared value and upholding re-determination was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 19:00:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1517 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466859</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value of imported knitted fabrics cannot be discarded where no reliable evidence rebuts the price paid or payable and no proof of undisclosed payments exists; expert test results and unsupported assertions about product characteristics do not justify re-determination under the Valuation Rules. Separately, adjudication conducted without issuing a show cause notice or affording a personal hearing violates principles of natural justice; statements from other importers do not substitute for appellant-specific hearing or evidence. Operative effect: the impugned order rejecting declared value and upholding re-determination was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>