<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>JUDICIAL REVIEW AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15917</link>
    <description>Judicial review in disciplinary proceedings is confined to assessing procedural legality and evidential adequacy; courts will not reappreciate merits but will set aside findings and penalties that are perverse or based on no evidence, violate natural justice, or fail to follow prescribed inquiry steps such as obtaining expert verification where disputed evidence warrants it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 07:39:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 07:39:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>JUDICIAL REVIEW AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15917</link>
      <description>Judicial review in disciplinary proceedings is confined to assessing procedural legality and evidential adequacy; courts will not reappreciate merits but will set aside findings and penalties that are perverse or based on no evidence, violate natural justice, or fail to follow prescribed inquiry steps such as obtaining expert verification where disputed evidence warrants it.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 07:39:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>