<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1075 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786927</link>
    <description>MS frame parts and transformer tanks manufactured against buyer-specific drawings and purchase orders, and supported by buyer and professional certificates, were treated as components exclusively used in transformer manufacture rather than general articles of iron and steel. On that basis, classification under CTH 85049010 as parts of transformers was upheld and the alternative classification under CTH 73269099 was rejected. The text also states that where periodic returns disclosed the adopted classification and the department was aware of the clearances, no suppression or concealment existed, so the extended limitation period could not be invoked and penalty was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 07:38:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1075 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786927</link>
      <description>MS frame parts and transformer tanks manufactured against buyer-specific drawings and purchase orders, and supported by buyer and professional certificates, were treated as components exclusively used in transformer manufacture rather than general articles of iron and steel. On that basis, classification under CTH 85049010 as parts of transformers was upheld and the alternative classification under CTH 73269099 was rejected. The text also states that where periodic returns disclosed the adopted classification and the department was aware of the clearances, no suppression or concealment existed, so the extended limitation period could not be invoked and penalty was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>