<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1093 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786945</link>
    <description>A taxpayer was found entitled to a nil withholding certificate for Matching solution services under section 197 because, on a prima facie review of the agreements and legal position, the receipts were not chargeable to tax in India and did not constitute fees for included services under Article 12(4) of the India-US DTAA. The competent authority was held to have no sustainable basis to deny nil rate for that component, and the denial was set aside to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 07:38:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1093 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786945</link>
      <description>A taxpayer was found entitled to a nil withholding certificate for Matching solution services under section 197 because, on a prima facie review of the agreements and legal position, the receipts were not chargeable to tax in India and did not constitute fees for included services under Article 12(4) of the India-US DTAA. The competent authority was held to have no sustainable basis to deny nil rate for that component, and the denial was set aside to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>