<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 186 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50271</link>
    <description>Exemption notifications must be applied strictly to their express conditions, and the amended notification was read as requiring compliance at the input-yarn stage rather than the final product. Because the assessee&#039;s dyeing, printing and bleaching activities meant the stated condition was not met, exemption for the relevant period was denied. Duty on the final product had to be re-quantified after allowing admissible Modvat credit on eligible inputs, subject to verification of duty payment on those inputs. Personal penalty was not sustained, as the dispute was treated as a bona fide interpretational issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 186 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50271</link>
      <description>Exemption notifications must be applied strictly to their express conditions, and the amended notification was read as requiring compliance at the input-yarn stage rather than the final product. Because the assessee&#039;s dyeing, printing and bleaching activities meant the stated condition was not met, exemption for the relevant period was denied. Duty on the final product had to be re-quantified after allowing admissible Modvat credit on eligible inputs, subject to verification of duty payment on those inputs. Personal penalty was not sustained, as the dispute was treated as a bona fide interpretational issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>