<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Consideration for Services: target incentives and reimbursements held non taxable, brokerage and assumption based demands disallowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97059</link>
    <description>Appellate tribunal addressed taxability of various receipts of an agent: performance or target incentives paid by airlines were held not to constitute consideration for a taxable service and demand cancelled; freight brokerage/commission on freight could not be classified as business auxiliary service and demand set aside; reimbursements of expenses reimbursed after payment fall outside taxable value (85% abatement applicable) and related demand disallowed; alleged labour charge liability based on assumptions without verification was unsustainable; invocation of extended period failed for lack of suppression with intent to evade, and consequential interest and penalty demands were also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:57:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:57:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Consideration for Services: target incentives and reimbursements held non taxable, brokerage and assumption based demands disallowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97059</link>
      <description>Appellate tribunal addressed taxability of various receipts of an agent: performance or target incentives paid by airlines were held not to constitute consideration for a taxable service and demand cancelled; freight brokerage/commission on freight could not be classified as business auxiliary service and demand set aside; reimbursements of expenses reimbursed after payment fall outside taxable value (85% abatement applicable) and related demand disallowed; alleged labour charge liability based on assumptions without verification was unsustainable; invocation of extended period failed for lack of suppression with intent to evade, and consequential interest and penalty demands were also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:57:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>