https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466834 A timely renewal application kept the mining lease alive by operation of the deeming provision in Rule 24A(6), so the lease was treated as continued pending disposal of the renewal request. On that footing, the lessee was entitled to remove the already extracted and stacked iron ore, because the claim did not depend on post-expiry rights under the lease deed. Removal could, however, be regulated by notice to the mining authorities, supervision by a competent officer, payment of royalty, and compliance within the stipulated time. en-us Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:45:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466834 A timely renewal application kept the mining lease alive by operation of the deeming provision in Rule 24A(6), so the lease was treated as continued pending disposal of the renewal request. On that footing, the lessee was entitled to remove the already extracted and stacked iron ore, because the claim did not depend on post-expiry rights under the lease deed. Removal could, however, be regulated by notice to the mining authorities, supervision by a competent officer, payment of royalty, and compliance within the stipulated time. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466834