<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 197 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed two Revenue appeals due to delays in filing. In the first case, a 100-day delay by M/s. Titan Industries Ltd. was attributed to a revised decision by the Board, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. In the second case of CCE v. M/s. Precision Mech fab, a 23-day delay was sought to be condoned due to inter-departmental delays, but the Tribunal rejected the application, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 197 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed two Revenue appeals due to delays in filing. In the first case, a 100-day delay by M/s. Titan Industries Ltd. was attributed to a revised decision by the Board, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. In the second case of CCE v. M/s. Precision Mech fab, a 23-day delay was sought to be condoned due to inter-departmental delays, but the Tribunal rejected the application, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>