<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1009 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786861</link>
    <description>Machining/job-work on forged wheels performed solely between the contractor and the principal does not constitute a taxable Business Auxiliary Service; the Tribunal applied precedent distinguishing production or processing for only two parties from BAS and set aside the service-tax demand. For services after 16-06-2005, where raw materials were supplied by the client and processed goods were returned for use in dutiable manufacture with end-use evidence, the exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-S.T. was held available. Concurrently, the penalty against the company official, being contingent on the confirmed demand, was also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 09:29:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1009 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786861</link>
      <description>Machining/job-work on forged wheels performed solely between the contractor and the principal does not constitute a taxable Business Auxiliary Service; the Tribunal applied precedent distinguishing production or processing for only two parties from BAS and set aside the service-tax demand. For services after 16-06-2005, where raw materials were supplied by the client and processed goods were returned for use in dutiable manufacture with end-use evidence, the exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-S.T. was held available. Concurrently, the penalty against the company official, being contingent on the confirmed demand, was also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>