<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1061 - DELHI HIGH  COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786913</link>
    <description>Whether an ex parte best judgment assessment under tax law can be set aside where the Interim Resolution Professional assumed de jure control during a stayed Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and both the IRP and company management were bona fide prevented from placing material before the Assessing Officer; court applied principles of procedural fairness and found the appellate remedy would be illusory given practical obstacles, concluding the assessment required setting aside and remanding for a fresh/comprehensive notice, an adequate period to respond (at least thirty days) and a fresh order after considering the petitioner&#039;s reply and documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 09:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1061 - DELHI HIGH  COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786913</link>
      <description>Whether an ex parte best judgment assessment under tax law can be set aside where the Interim Resolution Professional assumed de jure control during a stayed Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and both the IRP and company management were bona fide prevented from placing material before the Assessing Officer; court applied principles of procedural fairness and found the appellate remedy would be illusory given practical obstacles, concluding the assessment required setting aside and remanding for a fresh/comprehensive notice, an adequate period to respond (at least thirty days) and a fresh order after considering the petitioner&#039;s reply and documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>