<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fraudulent preference: related-party transfer pre winding is void ab initio; liquidator may recover and realize the assets.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97041</link>
    <description>Fraudulent preference transfers by a company shortly before winding up are void ab initio when designed to defeat creditors; such transfers differ from otherwise bona fide transactions that may be avoidable under a separate provision requiring good faith and valuable consideration. A related-party lease of significant company assets executed immediately prior to the winding-up petition was held sham, not at arm&#039;s length, and void from inception; the official liquidator&#039;s application to take possession and sell the property for creditor realization should not have been dismissed on limitation grounds. The appellate court allowed the appeal and declared the transfer void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:28:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:28:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Fraudulent preference: related-party transfer pre winding is void ab initio; liquidator may recover and realize the assets.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97041</link>
      <description>Fraudulent preference transfers by a company shortly before winding up are void ab initio when designed to defeat creditors; such transfers differ from otherwise bona fide transactions that may be avoidable under a separate provision requiring good faith and valuable consideration. A related-party lease of significant company assets executed immediately prior to the winding-up petition was held sham, not at arm&#039;s length, and void from inception; the official liquidator&#039;s application to take possession and sell the property for creditor realization should not have been dismissed on limitation grounds. The appellate court allowed the appeal and declared the transfer void.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:28:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>