<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 963 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786815</link>
    <description>Works contract services claimed as connected with water supply and performed as a sub-contractor required verification of the contracts and supporting evidence before exemption eligibility could be decided, so the exemption issue was remanded for fresh consideration. The penalties could not be sustained in light of the unresolved substantive exemption claim and the need for further examination, so they were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 10:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 963 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786815</link>
      <description>Works contract services claimed as connected with water supply and performed as a sub-contractor required verification of the contracts and supporting evidence before exemption eligibility could be decided, so the exemption issue was remanded for fresh consideration. The penalties could not be sustained in light of the unresolved substantive exemption claim and the need for further examination, so they were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>