<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 977 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786829</link>
    <description>Disciplinary licensing decisions under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations involve assessment of evidence, proportionality of sanction, and consequences for fundamental rights; appellate interference is limited to cases where the administrative choice is arbitrary, perverse, violates natural justice, or fails proportionality. Where factual findings about employer liability for employee misconduct, delay, corrective measures, and parallel proceedings have been considered by the licensing authority, its decision to impose a reduced monetary penalty rather than revoke a licence is sustainable. The principle of restraint requires upholding reasoned, non drastic sanctions absent demonstrable unfairness or perversity in the exercise of discretion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 08:23:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 977 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786829</link>
      <description>Disciplinary licensing decisions under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations involve assessment of evidence, proportionality of sanction, and consequences for fundamental rights; appellate interference is limited to cases where the administrative choice is arbitrary, perverse, violates natural justice, or fails proportionality. Where factual findings about employer liability for employee misconduct, delay, corrective measures, and parallel proceedings have been considered by the licensing authority, its decision to impose a reduced monetary penalty rather than revoke a licence is sustainable. The principle of restraint requires upholding reasoned, non drastic sanctions absent demonstrable unfairness or perversity in the exercise of discretion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>