<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 978 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786830</link>
    <description>Undisclosed foundational material, including a test report relied on for reclassification, cannot sustain an adjudication because the affected importer must have a fair opportunity to rebut the case against it; the demand was therefore set aside for breach of natural justice. On classification, PVC suspension resin was treated as falling under the specific declared tariff entry rather than a residuary heading, applying the settled principle that a specific tariff entry prevails over a general or residuary entry under Rule 3(a) of the General Rules for the Interpretation of Import Tariff Schedule. The reclassification was rejected and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 08:23:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 978 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786830</link>
      <description>Undisclosed foundational material, including a test report relied on for reclassification, cannot sustain an adjudication because the affected importer must have a fair opportunity to rebut the case against it; the demand was therefore set aside for breach of natural justice. On classification, PVC suspension resin was treated as falling under the specific declared tariff entry rather than a residuary heading, applying the settled principle that a specific tariff entry prevails over a general or residuary entry under Rule 3(a) of the General Rules for the Interpretation of Import Tariff Schedule. The reclassification was rejected and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>