<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 127 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50244</link>
    <description>Air blowing straight grade bitumen into blown grade bitumen did not amount to manufacture under Central Excise law, as the issue was already covered by the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case. Repacking bitumen from bulk into drums also did not amount to manufacture in the absence of a relevant chapter note. Applying that reasoning to identical processes, the impugned orders were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 127 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50244</link>
      <description>Air blowing straight grade bitumen into blown grade bitumen did not amount to manufacture under Central Excise law, as the issue was already covered by the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case. Repacking bitumen from bulk into drums also did not amount to manufacture in the absence of a relevant chapter note. Applying that reasoning to identical processes, the impugned orders were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>