https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786849 Where an impugned order is appealable to the tribunal, the High Court held that statutory alternate remedies ordinarily bar invocation of writ jurisdiction; the writ petition was therefore declined and the petitioner directed to pursue the statutory appeal. The court treated the petitioner's claim as limited to interest on an already allowed refund and held that no pre-deposit is required for the appeal. The tribunal was directed to decide the appeal on merits (and not on limitation) if filed within four weeks of uploading of the order. en-us Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 08:23:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786849 Where an impugned order is appealable to the tribunal, the High Court held that statutory alternate remedies ordinarily bar invocation of writ jurisdiction; the writ petition was therefore declined and the petitioner directed to pursue the statutory appeal. The court treated the petitioner's claim as limited to interest on an already allowed refund and held that no pre-deposit is required for the appeal. The tribunal was directed to decide the appeal on merits (and not on limitation) if filed within four weeks of uploading of the order. Case-Laws GST Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786849