https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466784 A disciplinary finding of forgery was held unsafe in judicial review where the inquiry relied on the doctor's denial without testing the disputed handwriting against admitted signatures or obtaining expert evidence. The core allegation was fabrication of a medical certificate, and the Court treated the evidence as insufficient for so grave a charge. Mere delay in giving the explanation was found insignificant. As the finding that the certificate was not genuine was perverse and unsupported by credible evidence, the dismissal from service could not be sustained. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Feb 2026 17:00:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466784 A disciplinary finding of forgery was held unsafe in judicial review where the inquiry relied on the doctor's denial without testing the disputed handwriting against admitted signatures or obtaining expert evidence. The core allegation was fabrication of a medical certificate, and the Court treated the evidence as insufficient for so grave a charge. Mere delay in giving the explanation was found insignificant. As the finding that the certificate was not genuine was perverse and unsupported by credible evidence, the dismissal from service could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466784