<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1522 - ITAT KOCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466776</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 271B for delayed filing of the tax audit report may be deleted where the delay is supported by reasonable cause and no prejudice to revenue is shown; the tribunal accepted evidence of the managing partner&#039;s death and condoned delay, following precedent to delete the penalty. The operative effect is that imposition of the penalty was set aside and the appeal allowed to the extent of deleting the Section 271B penalty against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1522 - ITAT KOCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466776</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 271B for delayed filing of the tax audit report may be deleted where the delay is supported by reasonable cause and no prejudice to revenue is shown; the tribunal accepted evidence of the managing partner&#039;s death and condoned delay, following precedent to delete the penalty. The operative effect is that imposition of the penalty was set aside and the appeal allowed to the extent of deleting the Section 271B penalty against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>