<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 895 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786747</link>
    <description>Services used to meet statutory factory obligations, including AMC of water coolers and housekeeping, cleaning, maintenance and repair services for the canteen, were treated as input services because they had an indirect nexus with manufacture and fell within the inclusive part of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004; credit was therefore admissible. Works contract, construction and architectural services used for repair, renovation and modernisation of factory premises were also held eligible, because they related to maintenance and improvement of the existing factory and were not covered by the exclusion for new construction; credit was therefore admissible. The denial of CENVAT credit on both sets of services was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 895 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786747</link>
      <description>Services used to meet statutory factory obligations, including AMC of water coolers and housekeeping, cleaning, maintenance and repair services for the canteen, were treated as input services because they had an indirect nexus with manufacture and fell within the inclusive part of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004; credit was therefore admissible. Works contract, construction and architectural services used for repair, renovation and modernisation of factory premises were also held eligible, because they related to maintenance and improvement of the existing factory and were not covered by the exclusion for new construction; credit was therefore admissible. The denial of CENVAT credit on both sets of services was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>