<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 908 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786760</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on input services attributable to taxable output services remains available even where the output-service receivable is written off as a bad debt. Non-recovery of consideration from the service recipient does not, by itself, defeat entitlement to credit or require reversal of input-service credit. The stated principle follows Tribunal precedent, including Vodafone Cellular and Krishna Communication, treating irrecoverability of output-service invoices as insufficient grounds for automatic credit reversal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:58:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 908 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786760</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on input services attributable to taxable output services remains available even where the output-service receivable is written off as a bad debt. Non-recovery of consideration from the service recipient does not, by itself, defeat entitlement to credit or require reversal of input-service credit. The stated principle follows Tribunal precedent, including Vodafone Cellular and Krishna Communication, treating irrecoverability of output-service invoices as insufficient grounds for automatic credit reversal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>