<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1747 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466735</link>
    <description>Police powers to issue a prohibitory order over an accused company&#039;s bank account were challenged in a Special Leave Petition seeking unfreezing. On the peculiar facts, the SC declined to exercise its Article 136 jurisdiction and dismissed the petition. The text records no broader ruling on the legality of freezing powers; the matter was disposed of on its own facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 20:11:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1747 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466735</link>
      <description>Police powers to issue a prohibitory order over an accused company&#039;s bank account were challenged in a Special Leave Petition seeking unfreezing. On the peculiar facts, the SC declined to exercise its Article 136 jurisdiction and dismissed the petition. The text records no broader ruling on the legality of freezing powers; the matter was disposed of on its own facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>