<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1673 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466742</link>
    <description>Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was examined for compliance with Section 19. The written grounds of arrest were supplied on the date of arrest and acknowledged, satisfying the requirement that the arrestee be informed of the grounds and that reasons be recorded in writing. The remand court was found to have applied its mind to the arrest material and prima facie allegations, so the remand orders were not vitiated. Forwarding the arrest material to the Adjudicating Authority a day or two later under Section 19(2) did not, by itself, show non-compliance because same-day transmission is not a mandatory requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 20:11:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1673 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466742</link>
      <description>Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was examined for compliance with Section 19. The written grounds of arrest were supplied on the date of arrest and acknowledged, satisfying the requirement that the arrestee be informed of the grounds and that reasons be recorded in writing. The remand court was found to have applied its mind to the arrest material and prima facie allegations, so the remand orders were not vitiated. Forwarding the arrest material to the Adjudicating Authority a day or two later under Section 19(2) did not, by itself, show non-compliance because same-day transmission is not a mandatory requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>