<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1514 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466758</link>
    <description>Whether penalty for failure to maintain transfer pricing documents can be sustained where the AO did not identify which Rule 10D categories were missing: the Tribunal applied the principle that Revenue must particularise the specific documents or information not maintained before imposing penalty, and that a TPO&#039;s finding that the assessee furnished required details and that the international transaction was at arm&#039;s length negates asserted default. Because the AO&#039;s proceedings were non specific and the TPO recorded no default or recommendation for penalty, the penalty under Section 271AA was held unsustainable and deleted by CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 17:23:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1514 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466758</link>
      <description>Whether penalty for failure to maintain transfer pricing documents can be sustained where the AO did not identify which Rule 10D categories were missing: the Tribunal applied the principle that Revenue must particularise the specific documents or information not maintained before imposing penalty, and that a TPO&#039;s finding that the assessee furnished required details and that the international transaction was at arm&#039;s length negates asserted default. Because the AO&#039;s proceedings were non specific and the TPO recorded no default or recommendation for penalty, the penalty under Section 271AA was held unsustainable and deleted by CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>