<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1590 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466770</link>
    <description>The primary issue was whether a High Court should have declined a writ petition because an alternate statutory remedy existed; the Court applied the alternative remedy principle, noting that availability of an appeal under the statutory scheme requires resort to that remedy and that the appellate authority can consider and condone limitation objections. The Supreme Court recorded that the petitioner had the statutory appeal available and that limitation-related contentions could be addressed by the appellate forum; no view was taken on the substantive merits and the writ petition was disposed as rightly refused by the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 16:24:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=887013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1590 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466770</link>
      <description>The primary issue was whether a High Court should have declined a writ petition because an alternate statutory remedy existed; the Court applied the alternative remedy principle, noting that availability of an appeal under the statutory scheme requires resort to that remedy and that the appellate authority can consider and condone limitation objections. The Supreme Court recorded that the petitioner had the statutory appeal available and that limitation-related contentions could be addressed by the appellate forum; no view was taken on the substantive merits and the writ petition was disposed as rightly refused by the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>