https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786682 Remand by the writ court required fresh consideration of specific allegations and left substantive issues open for re-evaluation; accordingly the original authority retains jurisdiction to re-adjudicate the remitted disputes and to reassess jurisdictional and factual questions in light of documents or communications submitted during the writ appeal's pendency. Subsequent events or assertions of compliance do not automatically oust the authority's power to revisit the matters; affected parties may place relevant materials before the authority for fresh determination. en-us Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Feb 2026 08:11:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786682 Remand by the writ court required fresh consideration of specific allegations and left substantive issues open for re-evaluation; accordingly the original authority retains jurisdiction to re-adjudicate the remitted disputes and to reassess jurisdictional and factual questions in light of documents or communications submitted during the writ appeal's pendency. Subsequent events or assertions of compliance do not automatically oust the authority's power to revisit the matters; affected parties may place relevant materials before the authority for fresh determination. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786682