<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 837 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786689</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay in a service tax appeal requires a satisfactory explanation supported by the record. Dispatch-register entries, recovery correspondence, bank communications and acknowledgements may establish constructive knowledge of an adjudicated demand even where statutory proof of postal delivery is unavailable. Medical certificates that pre-date the impugned order and do not show incapacitation from filing do not justify prolonged delay. An excessive delay of nearly 1,400 days was treated as insufficiently explained; ordinary condonation was refused, while admission of the appeal was made conditional on a cost deposit into the Prime Minister&#039;s National Relief Fund within six weeks, failing which the file would be closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 13:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 837 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786689</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay in a service tax appeal requires a satisfactory explanation supported by the record. Dispatch-register entries, recovery correspondence, bank communications and acknowledgements may establish constructive knowledge of an adjudicated demand even where statutory proof of postal delivery is unavailable. Medical certificates that pre-date the impugned order and do not show incapacitation from filing do not justify prolonged delay. An excessive delay of nearly 1,400 days was treated as insufficiently explained; ordinary condonation was refused, while admission of the appeal was made conditional on a cost deposit into the Prime Minister&#039;s National Relief Fund within six weeks, failing which the file would be closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>