https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786698 CCI may direct a Director General investigation only where adequate material establishes a prima facie competition-law case. Alleged abuse of dominance through stock exchange co-location facilities required material showing relevant market, dominance, conduct falling within Section 4, and actual or likely appreciable adverse effect on competition. Co-location arrangements, first-come allocation, and the earlier TCP/IP architecture without a load balancer or randomiser did not, on the available material, establish discriminatory conditions, denial of equitable access, or likely competitive harm. Sectoral regulator and expert findings could be considered on technical and factual matters, while CCI remained responsible for its own prima facie assessment. The allegations therefore did not warrant a DG inquiry. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Feb 2026 08:11:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786698 CCI may direct a Director General investigation only where adequate material establishes a prima facie competition-law case. Alleged abuse of dominance through stock exchange co-location facilities required material showing relevant market, dominance, conduct falling within Section 4, and actual or likely appreciable adverse effect on competition. Co-location arrangements, first-come allocation, and the earlier TCP/IP architecture without a load balancer or randomiser did not, on the available material, establish discriminatory conditions, denial of equitable access, or likely competitive harm. Sectoral regulator and expert findings could be considered on technical and factual matters, while CCI remained responsible for its own prima facie assessment. The allegations therefore did not warrant a DG inquiry. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786698