https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50210 A product was classified as a skin-care preparation rather than an ayurvedic medicament because its ingredients and use directions did not establish therapeutic or prophylactic character. Herbal extracts alone were insufficient to prove medicinal use, and the directions indicated regular cosmetic application rather than treatment for a specific condition. Applying the settled test for medicament classification, the absence of adequate evidence of medicinal character justified acceptance of the departmental classification under Heading 33.04, and the appeals failed with the duty liability left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:25:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50210 A product was classified as a skin-care preparation rather than an ayurvedic medicament because its ingredients and use directions did not establish therapeutic or prophylactic character. Herbal extracts alone were insufficient to prove medicinal use, and the directions indicated regular cosmetic application rather than treatment for a specific condition. Applying the settled test for medicament classification, the absence of adequate evidence of medicinal character justified acceptance of the departmental classification under Heading 33.04, and the appeals failed with the duty liability left undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50210