<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 118 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50208</link>
    <description>A portable all ball bearing electric blower used for cleaning machines and machine parts was held to fall under Heading 8508 as an electro-mechanical tool for working in hand with a self-contained electric motor, not under Heading 8414 as an electric fan. The classification was determined by the tariff interpretation rules, section and chapter notes, and the HSN Explanatory Notes, which treated industrial blowers used for cleaning as falling within Heading 8508. The document also states that duty for December 1989 to May 1990 could not be enforced because the relevant classification list had already been finally approved and clearances were made on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:22:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 118 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50208</link>
      <description>A portable all ball bearing electric blower used for cleaning machines and machine parts was held to fall under Heading 8508 as an electro-mechanical tool for working in hand with a self-contained electric motor, not under Heading 8414 as an electric fan. The classification was determined by the tariff interpretation rules, section and chapter notes, and the HSN Explanatory Notes, which treated industrial blowers used for cleaning as falling within Heading 8508. The document also states that duty for December 1989 to May 1990 could not be enforced because the relevant classification list had already been finally approved and clearances were made on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>