<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1793 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466711</link>
    <description>The text addresses validity of an administrative extension of the time for issuing a show-cause notice under the Customs Act, focusing on the proviso requiring reasons in writing and prior communication to the affected person. Key legal points: recording the Commissioner&#039;s approval and reasons on the official file satisfies the proviso; a subordinate communication issuing that decision is effective where the department affirmatively avers its origin; contested handwriting, alleged forgery and procurement of signatures raise factual disputes unsuitable for resolution on affidavit in writ proceedings; absence of a document identification number does not ipso facto void an otherwise affirmed departmental communication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 19:25:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1793 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466711</link>
      <description>The text addresses validity of an administrative extension of the time for issuing a show-cause notice under the Customs Act, focusing on the proviso requiring reasons in writing and prior communication to the affected person. Key legal points: recording the Commissioner&#039;s approval and reasons on the official file satisfies the proviso; a subordinate communication issuing that decision is effective where the department affirmatively avers its origin; contested handwriting, alleged forgery and procurement of signatures raise factual disputes unsuitable for resolution on affidavit in writ proceedings; absence of a document identification number does not ipso facto void an otherwise affirmed departmental communication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>