<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 757 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466696</link>
    <description>Section 482 CrPC must be used sparingly, and criminal proceedings should be quashed only where the complaint discloses no offence, is barred by law, or is frivolous, vexatious, or oppressive. At the quashing stage, the court should not conduct a detailed evidence assessment or pre-judge conviction. Allegations of theft of records, fabrication of a termination agreement, and criminal intimidation disclosed cognizable offences requiring trial, and the availability of a civil or company-law remedy did not by itself exclude criminal liability. The High Court was therefore not justified in quashing the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 12:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 757 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466696</link>
      <description>Section 482 CrPC must be used sparingly, and criminal proceedings should be quashed only where the complaint discloses no offence, is barred by law, or is frivolous, vexatious, or oppressive. At the quashing stage, the court should not conduct a detailed evidence assessment or pre-judge conviction. Allegations of theft of records, fabrication of a termination agreement, and criminal intimidation disclosed cognizable offences requiring trial, and the availability of a civil or company-law remedy did not by itself exclude criminal liability. The High Court was therefore not justified in quashing the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>