<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment jurisdiction under Section 153C required where search yields incriminating material of a third party; AO cannot use Section 147.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96949</link>
    <description>Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under section 147 solely on the basis of incriminating material seized during a search of a third party, but where information pertains to a person other than the searched party the proper statutory route is assessment under section 153C; therefore the AO lacked jurisdiction to proceed under section 147 and the appellate authority correctly quashed the 147 proceedings. Separately, additions for alleged &#039;on money&#039; receipts were deleted because the AO extrapolated figures from seized documents without any corroborative evidence or independent inquiry, rendering the additions speculative and unsupported.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:09:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:09:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment jurisdiction under Section 153C required where search yields incriminating material of a third party; AO cannot use Section 147.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96949</link>
      <description>Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under section 147 solely on the basis of incriminating material seized during a search of a third party, but where information pertains to a person other than the searched party the proper statutory route is assessment under section 153C; therefore the AO lacked jurisdiction to proceed under section 147 and the appellate authority correctly quashed the 147 proceedings. Separately, additions for alleged &#039;on money&#039; receipts were deleted because the AO extrapolated figures from seized documents without any corroborative evidence or independent inquiry, rendering the additions speculative and unsupported.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:09:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>