<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>LUT Delay Is Curable, Refund Denial Is Not: Karnataka HC Sets the Record Straight - M/s Prime Perfumery Works - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15897</link>
    <description>Belated furnishing of Letter of Undertaking does not automatically disentitle exporters to refund of unutilised input tax credit; where exports are genuine and undisputed, the procedural requirement of prior LUT is curable and authorities must consider CBIC circulars permitting condonation and ex post facto acceptance before rejecting refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 07:31:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 07:31:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>LUT Delay Is Curable, Refund Denial Is Not: Karnataka HC Sets the Record Straight - M/s Prime Perfumery Works - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15897</link>
      <description>Belated furnishing of Letter of Undertaking does not automatically disentitle exporters to refund of unutilised input tax credit; where exports are genuine and undisputed, the procedural requirement of prior LUT is curable and authorities must consider CBIC circulars permitting condonation and ex post facto acceptance before rejecting refund claims.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 07:31:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>