<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 789 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786641</link>
    <description>In a Section 7 insolvency application, substantial compliance with the prescribed form is sufficient where the amended application and supporting records disclose the financial debt, default and date of default, so rejection for want of fuller particulars is not warranted. Limitation is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, and a written acknowledgment of liability signed by the corporate debtor, including restructuring agreements and signed balance sheets, extends time under Section 18; the filing was therefore within limitation. Pendency of recovery proceedings, counterclaims or criminal complaints does not by itself show an oblique purpose or bar admission when debt and default are otherwise established, so the admission was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:25:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 789 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786641</link>
      <description>In a Section 7 insolvency application, substantial compliance with the prescribed form is sufficient where the amended application and supporting records disclose the financial debt, default and date of default, so rejection for want of fuller particulars is not warranted. Limitation is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, and a written acknowledgment of liability signed by the corporate debtor, including restructuring agreements and signed balance sheets, extends time under Section 18; the filing was therefore within limitation. Pendency of recovery proceedings, counterclaims or criminal complaints does not by itself show an oblique purpose or bar admission when debt and default are otherwise established, so the admission was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>