<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 189 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50188</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned Order, allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellant. The enhanced assessable value imposed by the adjudicating authority was overturned in favor of the appellant&#039;s declared value, as supported by a valuation report. The Tribunal also determined that the Glass Stones were covered by the appellant&#039;s GEM REP Licences, dismissing the licensing discrepancies raised by the Jem Testing Laboratory.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 189 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50188</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned Order, allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellant. The enhanced assessable value imposed by the adjudicating authority was overturned in favor of the appellant&#039;s declared value, as supported by a valuation report. The Tribunal also determined that the Glass Stones were covered by the appellant&#039;s GEM REP Licences, dismissing the licensing discrepancies raised by the Jem Testing Laboratory.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>