<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 814 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786666</link>
    <description>Reopening of income-tax assessments on the sole basis of an audit party&#039;s objection that presents only a different opinion on facts already considered is impermissible; the statutory test for reopening requires the Assessing Officer to have his own reasoned &#039;reason to believe&#039; that income has escaped assessment, based on new or overlooked factual material. Where the audit objection points to a previously undiscovered factual omission, reassessment may follow provided the AO independently forms a reasoned satisfaction; where it merely reflects a contrary view on the same material, it amounts to change of opinion and cannot sustain reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 07:29:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 814 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786666</link>
      <description>Reopening of income-tax assessments on the sole basis of an audit party&#039;s objection that presents only a different opinion on facts already considered is impermissible; the statutory test for reopening requires the Assessing Officer to have his own reasoned &#039;reason to believe&#039; that income has escaped assessment, based on new or overlooked factual material. Where the audit objection points to a previously undiscovered factual omission, reassessment may follow provided the AO independently forms a reasoned satisfaction; where it merely reflects a contrary view on the same material, it amounts to change of opinion and cannot sustain reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>