<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 818 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786670</link>
    <description>Transfer of title in goods between persons located in India constitutes a supply within the taxable territory under Schedule II paragraph 1(a), triggering GST registration and tax liability even if physical movement occurs outside India. Questions on HSN/SAC classification and applicable rates, and on time and value of supply under Sections 12, 13 and 15, could not be determined generically and must be decided transaction-wise with specific particulars. Questions on business category, document maintenance, refund entitlement, invoicing designation and retrospective refund are not admissible for advance ruling under Section 97(2) and were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 07:29:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 818 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786670</link>
      <description>Transfer of title in goods between persons located in India constitutes a supply within the taxable territory under Schedule II paragraph 1(a), triggering GST registration and tax liability even if physical movement occurs outside India. Questions on HSN/SAC classification and applicable rates, and on time and value of supply under Sections 12, 13 and 15, could not be determined generically and must be decided transaction-wise with specific particulars. Questions on business category, document maintenance, refund entitlement, invoicing designation and retrospective refund are not admissible for advance ruling under Section 97(2) and were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>