https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786674 Natural justice was not violated because the hearing intimation specified the hearing date and consequences of non-appearance, the taxpayer's reply was considered, and no evidence showed that a later request for personal hearing was received before the adjudication order. The writ remedy under Article 226 should not be exercised where an effective statutory appeal is available under the CGST Act, absent exceptional circumstances. The writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal, without any determination of the underlying tax merits. en-us Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Feb 2026 07:29:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786674 Natural justice was not violated because the hearing intimation specified the hearing date and consequences of non-appearance, the taxpayer's reply was considered, and no evidence showed that a later request for personal hearing was received before the adjudication order. The writ remedy under Article 226 should not be exercised where an effective statutory appeal is available under the CGST Act, absent exceptional circumstances. The writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal, without any determination of the underlying tax merits. Case-Laws GST Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786674