<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1628 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466659</link>
    <description>Private defence was unavailable because the record did not show that the deceased was armed or that the accused faced a reasonable apprehension of death or grievous hurt; minor superficial injuries on the accused were not reliably linked to the occurrence, and the accused was treated as the aggressor. On the homicide charge, the evidence showed a single blow in a sudden quarrel, without premeditation, undue advantage, or cruel or unusual conduct, so Exception 4 to Section 300 applied and the offence was reduced from Section 304 Part I to Section 304 Part II. Credible injured-witness evidence, supported by medical evidence, sustained the hurt convictions under Sections 324 and 326 with modified sentences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 20:10:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1628 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466659</link>
      <description>Private defence was unavailable because the record did not show that the deceased was armed or that the accused faced a reasonable apprehension of death or grievous hurt; minor superficial injuries on the accused were not reliably linked to the occurrence, and the accused was treated as the aggressor. On the homicide charge, the evidence showed a single blow in a sudden quarrel, without premeditation, undue advantage, or cruel or unusual conduct, so Exception 4 to Section 300 applied and the offence was reduced from Section 304 Part I to Section 304 Part II. Credible injured-witness evidence, supported by medical evidence, sustained the hurt convictions under Sections 324 and 326 with modified sentences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>