<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1702 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466668</link>
    <description>Determination of the date of default was governed by contemporaneous records: bank statements, audited lender records and a NeSL entry showing default prior to the statutory window prevailed over reliance solely on a later demand/recall notice. The legal principle that financial debt can be proved without a written agreement when disbursement and time-value evidence exists was applied, and continuing default through the moratorium window does not bar initiation if default began earlier. Consequently the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s re-fixation based only on the demand notice was set aside and admission of the insolvency petition was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 20:10:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1702 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466668</link>
      <description>Determination of the date of default was governed by contemporaneous records: bank statements, audited lender records and a NeSL entry showing default prior to the statutory window prevailed over reliance solely on a later demand/recall notice. The legal principle that financial debt can be proved without a written agreement when disbursement and time-value evidence exists was applied, and continuing default through the moratorium window does not bar initiation if default began earlier. Consequently the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s re-fixation based only on the demand notice was set aside and admission of the insolvency petition was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>