<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1635 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466684</link>
    <description>Assessing Officer must record reasons and apply mind when fixing the deduction rate under the assessed provision; an unguided selection of a rate without explanation is impermissible. The impugned orders were quashed and remitted for de novo consideration with directions that the AO grant a personal hearing (notice at least five working days) and pass a reasoned order addressing all submissions within six weeks of upload.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 20:10:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1635 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466684</link>
      <description>Assessing Officer must record reasons and apply mind when fixing the deduction rate under the assessed provision; an unguided selection of a rate without explanation is impermissible. The impugned orders were quashed and remitted for de novo consideration with directions that the AO grant a personal hearing (notice at least five working days) and pass a reasoned order addressing all submissions within six weeks of upload.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>