<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (7) TMI 129 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466653</link>
    <description>A lawful compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC becomes part of the decree only to the extent that its terms relate to the suit, and the connected reliefs may be treated as adjusting the original claims rather than creating a separate contract. Monetary obligations under such a compromise can remain executable even if the formal decree is not immediately drawn up, because the passing of the decree is distinct from its ministerial preparation. A party who fails to object to executability at the first available execution stage may later be barred by constructive res judicata from reopening the same challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 13:05:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (7) TMI 129 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466653</link>
      <description>A lawful compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC becomes part of the decree only to the extent that its terms relate to the suit, and the connected reliefs may be treated as adjusting the original claims rather than creating a separate contract. Monetary obligations under such a compromise can remain executable even if the formal decree is not immediately drawn up, because the passing of the decree is distinct from its ministerial preparation. A party who fails to object to executability at the first available execution stage may later be barred by constructive res judicata from reopening the same challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>