<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 267 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466652</link>
    <description>Complaints for cheque dishonour may be filed by the payee or holder in due course. Where the complainant is a company, including a firm or association of individuals, it must act through a human representative connected with its affairs, such as a manager, partner, director or other authorised person. As the Negotiable Instruments Act does not prescribe an exclusive mode of corporate representation, practical representation by an authorised or connected person enables enforcement of cheque dishonour provisions. A complaint filed by a company through its manager is therefore maintainable, and cognizance should be taken in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 12:24:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 267 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466652</link>
      <description>Complaints for cheque dishonour may be filed by the payee or holder in due course. Where the complainant is a company, including a firm or association of individuals, it must act through a human representative connected with its affairs, such as a manager, partner, director or other authorised person. As the Negotiable Instruments Act does not prescribe an exclusive mode of corporate representation, practical representation by an authorised or connected person enables enforcement of cheque dishonour provisions. A complaint filed by a company through its manager is therefore maintainable, and cognizance should be taken in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>