<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 1073 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466649</link>
    <description>A compromise recorded during suit proceedings does not become executable merely because the parties agreed to remain bound by it. Where the suit was consciously dismissed as withdrawn and no decree embodying the compromise or any separable executable relief was passed, execution proceedings are unavailable. The agreement may have judicial recognition, but enforcement must be pursued through an independent appropriate remedy rather than by execution of the withdrawn suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 1073 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466649</link>
      <description>A compromise recorded during suit proceedings does not become executable merely because the parties agreed to remain bound by it. Where the suit was consciously dismissed as withdrawn and no decree embodying the compromise or any separable executable relief was passed, execution proceedings are unavailable. The agreement may have judicial recognition, but enforcement must be pursued through an independent appropriate remedy rather than by execution of the withdrawn suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>