<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty for inaccurate particulars denied where voluntary disclosure and bona fide DTAA difference of opinion removed liability.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96930</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was contested where taxability of interest and commitment fees turned on interpretation of the India Germany DTAA and whether a representative office constituted a Permanent Establishment; AO taxed receipts at 40% but Tribunal treated them under Article 11 at 10%. The CIT(A) and Tribunal found the addition arose from the assessee&#039;s voluntary disclosures and a bona fide difference of opinion, invoking Reliance Petroproducts that an unsustainable claim alone does not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars. Consequently no penalty was warranted and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:13:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:13:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty for inaccurate particulars denied where voluntary disclosure and bona fide DTAA difference of opinion removed liability.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96930</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was contested where taxability of interest and commitment fees turned on interpretation of the India Germany DTAA and whether a representative office constituted a Permanent Establishment; AO taxed receipts at 40% but Tribunal treated them under Article 11 at 10%. The CIT(A) and Tribunal found the addition arose from the assessee&#039;s voluntary disclosures and a bona fide difference of opinion, invoking Reliance Petroproducts that an unsustainable claim alone does not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars. Consequently no penalty was warranted and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:13:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>