<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Benami Transaction: fiduciary exemption rejected where no trust relationship, leading to attachment and confirmation of disputed properties.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96925</link>
    <description>The article addresses whether alleged transactions constituted benami transfers and whether the fiduciary exemption to the benami prohibition applies. It explains that fiduciary relation was not established: no power of attorney, absence of evidence that the ostensible purchaser held title for the benefit of the alleged beneficial owner, and no statutory permission for non tribal acquisition of tribal land. It states that simple entrustment of consideration or employment does not create a trust protected by trust law, that statutory repeal limits trust based exemptions, and that attachments of the disputed properties were therefore sustained as benami transfers contrary to tribal land restrictions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:05:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:05:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Benami Transaction: fiduciary exemption rejected where no trust relationship, leading to attachment and confirmation of disputed properties.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96925</link>
      <description>The article addresses whether alleged transactions constituted benami transfers and whether the fiduciary exemption to the benami prohibition applies. It explains that fiduciary relation was not established: no power of attorney, absence of evidence that the ostensible purchaser held title for the benefit of the alleged beneficial owner, and no statutory permission for non tribal acquisition of tribal land. It states that simple entrustment of consideration or employment does not create a trust protected by trust law, that statutory repeal limits trust based exemptions, and that attachments of the disputed properties were therefore sustained as benami transfers contrary to tribal land restrictions.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:05:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>