<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Invocation of guarantee: Form B demand notice does not substitute prior invocation; no default absent prior invocation, petition set aside.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96919</link>
    <description>NCLAT addressed whether a demand notice in Form B under Rule 7(1) of the Personal Guarantor Rules, 2019, can itself constitute invocation of a guarantee for purposes of filing under Section 95 of the Code. The Tribunal held that a guarantor is a debtor who is a personal guarantor to the corporate debtor and that the financial creditor must invoke the guarantee prior to issuing a Form B demand; a pre-existing default by the guarantor must exist at the time of that notice. Absence of prior invocation meant no default and the adjudicating authority&#039;s admission was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:58:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:58:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Invocation of guarantee: Form B demand notice does not substitute prior invocation; no default absent prior invocation, petition set aside.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96919</link>
      <description>NCLAT addressed whether a demand notice in Form B under Rule 7(1) of the Personal Guarantor Rules, 2019, can itself constitute invocation of a guarantee for purposes of filing under Section 95 of the Code. The Tribunal held that a guarantor is a debtor who is a personal guarantor to the corporate debtor and that the financial creditor must invoke the guarantee prior to issuing a Form B demand; a pre-existing default by the guarantor must exist at the time of that notice. Absence of prior invocation meant no default and the adjudicating authority&#039;s admission was set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:58:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>