<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 734 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786586</link>
    <description>Rejection of refund of unutilized Cenvat credit on nexus and minor procedural grounds is impermissible where the credit&#039;s correctness and admissibility were not challenged at the time of availment. Applying the statutory framework for Cenvat credits and extant clarifications, the authorities cannot deny refund under Rule 5 for lack of nexus or defects such as missing registration identifiers or non-issuance on registered premises when receipt and use of input services for exported output services are established. Reliance on prior Tribunal reasoning supports allowance of the refund; accordingly the impugned orders rejecting the refund were set aside and the appellant granted the claimed refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 734 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786586</link>
      <description>Rejection of refund of unutilized Cenvat credit on nexus and minor procedural grounds is impermissible where the credit&#039;s correctness and admissibility were not challenged at the time of availment. Applying the statutory framework for Cenvat credits and extant clarifications, the authorities cannot deny refund under Rule 5 for lack of nexus or defects such as missing registration identifiers or non-issuance on registered premises when receipt and use of input services for exported output services are established. Reliance on prior Tribunal reasoning supports allowance of the refund; accordingly the impugned orders rejecting the refund were set aside and the appellant granted the claimed refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>